Who now holds the authority
to administer God's government on earth today?

Does God's government even exist on earth today,
and if so, where can you find it?

Over the last 20 years, the Church of God which Christ founded has entered the prophecied Rev. 3:14-21 Laodicean age. By definition, Laodicea means the people rule. However God's church is supposed to be ruled by GOD and carry God's authority.

Herbert W. Armstrong used to claim this authority for the original Worldwide Church of God. (RIGHT CLICK, and choose 'Save Target As' for the 1983 free brochure pdf download file documenting his meetings with world leaders at that time.) Since his death in 1986, many of the church splits from this original group continued to claim to have inherited this authority, as holders of the Philadelphia lampstand or candlestick (Rev. 1:20). Do they really have this authority? Was the baton passed from one group to another when the churches split? If so, where is it today? WHO HAS IT NOW?

What is God's government?

The Bible says in 1 John 4:8 that God is love. Romans 13:10 says love is the fulfilling of the law.

Therefore, the authority of God includes the love of God, and is the government of God which holds to Gods laws. It is God's government - not man's. Whether man can administer it or not will be discussed below. But first, the point must be made that whatever any man says must come secondary to whatever God says. This is the first commandment. -- Exodus 20:3.

Structure and shape

God gave us an example of his government structure in Exodus 18:21, 25, and Deut. 1:15. This is a pyramid structure. Although a number of churches dispute that this sets a pattern for our time now, it is fairly clear. All of nature has a pyramid structure. Planets revolve around suns, which revolve around the centre of the galaxy. Electrons orbit the nucleus of an atom. Eph. 5:23 puts the husband as the head of the wife, which spreads into a pyramid structure as the family grows. The new Jerusalem will most likely even be shaped like a pyramid. See Rev. 21:16.

In the world of commerce, pyramid selling is illegal. Do you know what makes the difference between an illegal pyramid and a fully legal network marketing organisation? In principle, it's what happens to the end user. If the end user makes a loss, and is hurt financially without receiving an equivalent product benefit, it is (or should be) an illegal pyramid. Some may even object to me using this as an example, but ideally, in a legitimate Multi Level Marketing, or network marketing organisation, the end user is supposed to benefit. The product benefits for the end user should outweigh the price paid (I'm talking about the way it should work).

The ideal in the above example is how God's government works in principle. That is, the people at the bottom levels of God's pyramid, the end users, have all those above them serving them, and from this they benefit greatly. This is the meaning of Christ washing the feet of the disciples. -- John 13:4-17.

Also like network marketing, in God's governmental pyramid, the 'product' can often be more clearly demonstrated and explained with one-on-one personal tuition, or personal counselling by ministers.

Another way a pyramid structure works with God's government, is that it remains stable, while it may continue to multiply and expand forever! Isaiah 9:7 says God's government will have no end.

Who can administer it?

If the government of God comes from God, can humans administer it?

Yes. In the New Testament church, great power and authority was given to the disciples. -- Luke 10:17.

The story of Ananias and Sapphira in Acts 5:1-5 shows that this authority extended over the church, as well as the demons.

BUT WHO HAS IT TODAY?

A leader of one of the church splits dismisses the idea of a succession of leaders in the church without any gap, as a Catholic idea, and therefore he says it's not correct. But just because the Catholics may believe it, does NOT make it incorrect. The Catholics are against abortion. So is God's true church. To say that because the Catholics believe something, it makes it incorrect, is not a valid argument.

This leader cannot admit to the "no gap" understanding because it puts into question his own claim to the physical leadership of the church.

Before I explain how a physical leadership has continued without a gap, I need to explain where the body of Christ has been during the last 20 years.

A large part of the confusion on this subject is because the true church is a spiritual body, NOT a corporate body. In the Laodicean age the spiritual body has remained loyal to Christ to varying degrees, so in this way Christ's spiritual body --the church-- has NOT become divided in it's loyalty to Christ, to the degree that each member of that body has been able to understand where the truth is. Loyalty to the physical leader of a corporate body on the other hand, is an entirely different matter.

Generally speaking, God will bless those who obey his laws, whether or not the people are technically within one corporate body or another... watch Priscilla Shirer on the above video explaining why you can not put God in a box. The Bible makes it clear, in Galatians 5:22, 23, that there is no law against love, speaking about God's love. The opposite also applies - God does NOT back up those who misuse authority. Anyone who thinks they have God's governmental authority, and uses it as an excuse to oppress others (thereby breaking God's law of love), does not have it.

Although the apostle Paul was a minister, he said that without charity, or love, he was nothing. To put it bluntly, this is the same as saying that if any man, or minister, in or out of God's church, does not use charity, especially when he corrects, he is actually nothing. "If I have not charity I am nothing". If instructions or correction comes from nothing, that reduces the instruction and correction to the level of nothing also! Therefore, some who think they hold authority in the Church may be in for an unpleasant surprise when they are called upon by Christ to answer for their actions.

At the beginning of 1986, when Mr. Herbert Armstrong died, Christ gave the main body of the true church four years to produce fruit, (see my page on church history here) and when it did not, Christ cut the main trunk of the church "tree' down. See Luke 13:6-9. Exactly four years later at the end of 1989 the Laodicean candlestick was passed to the Philadelphia Church of God, which was the first enlightened church to protest the darkness, and break away from the false doctrines that the Worldwide Church of God were bringing in. (The PCG has produced their own videos about the church breakaway. They run several websites, including the Key of David TV program here.)

Mr. Flurry became the leader of the seventh church -- the leader of Laodicea -- but I believe the PCG has now become a cult. God never gave authority to any PCG minister to spiritually mistreat any brethren. Mr. Flurry's Philadelphia Church of God government held on to the correct pyramid structure of government, but not the correct spirit of love, that should have flowed throughout, down to the least member.

I don't claim to be infallible, so my present understanding of this next section may need future revision.

As I understand it, brethren who were still Philadelphian did not suddenly vanish. They were scattered among the churches that continued to break away from the WCG. Many became part of the Philadelphia Church of God also, and the Laodicean and Philadelphian candlesticks burned together in the PCG, with the Philadelphia candlestick possible being carried by Mr. John Amos who broke away from the WCG alongside Mr. Flurry, and died a few years later.

After this, God again began to separate those with a true Philadelphian attitude of brotherly love, and the candlestick for Philadelphia may also have passed from the PCG.

At no time was there ever any gap where the physical head of God's Laodicean church could not be identified or named, but the leader of Philadelphia since the beginning of the PCG has been somewhat hidden.

The Philadelphia candlestick MAY have been passed through the PCG, and through Mr Robert Ardis, leader of the Church of God's Faithful. From there, it MAY have passed to me when Mr. Robert Ardis rejected truth that I presented to him about the correct holy day dates. The two witnesses will soon carry the light of truth, but as yet, (despite my flood miracle), it remains to be seen who they are.

I believe the Philadelphian candlestick, and light of truth, currently resides with those who (a) hold onto brotherly love and (b) do not reject additional truth when it is revealed to them -- for proof of this, see Hosea 4:6.

God says the last shall be first. So the last holder of the candlestick may be one who is least in importance, --one not even recognised as holding any office in the church in this end time. If this is so,

 

Very soon TWO WITNESSES will carry TWO LAMPS for God, and become so visible THE WHOLE WORLD WILL SEE. (Rev. 11:4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

it is for the light of TRUTH only. IF there currently exists anyone who holds government authority for Philadelphia, --the church of brotherly love--, may it be someone who loves all brethren, who works towards peace and unity in this current age. Currently, there seems to be a number of Joshua-like ministers that need to repent. To a degree, Zech. 3:3 may serve as a metaphor for every person in God's church who will one day be made "kings and priests" at the resurrection, and crowned with a "fair mitre" (Zech. 3:5).

Except for worshipping another God, or teaching another gospel, other than the true gospel of the kingdom, I believe true brethren should work around difficult to resolve doctrinal disagreements,

This website stresses keeping the Holy Days correctly, but if some do not understand, I believe this is not an excuse to separate brethren. If doctrines cannot be agreed upon, as "two cannot walk together unless they be agreed" then let there be agreement to disagree on those issues alone, without abandoning 'charity' and good will towards each other.

If you can't fellowship with others who don't have your exact same understanding on all things, you show a great lack of maturity, and need to grow up!... Eph. 4:15, 16.

One final point; in order NOT to become a cult, the church should not be into "mind control" of it's membership. God wants us to control our own minds, not rely on the church to control our minds for us!

Very soon the two witnesses will appear on the scene. But miracles may not necessarily resolve anything if individual members cannot NOW discern the present truth in love.  

Links: David Pack, Robert Ardis, Frank Borg...

Here's a short list of places I personally download sermons from...  The last two have a great deal of new material, beyond former WCG material:

http://www.childrenofgod.net/sermons2.htm (Warren Zehrung)

http://www.cogministry.org/pastorsermons.html (Dave Campbell)

http://www.cogpt.org/sermonsdonhaney.htm (Don Haney)

http://cgfnw.org/SermonArchive/cgfnw1_hs.php (Harold Smith)

http://www.thercg.org/sermons.html (David Pack)
Mr. David Pack, leader of the Restored Church of God, now claims that he himself fulfils the role of Joshua spoken of in Zechariah Chapter 3, although he thinks that he, as Joshua, is no longer clothed in filthy garments... However he is NOT the Joshua spoken of in this prophecy, although in a sense he may be part correct, because, as I've said above, there currently seems to be many Joshua-like ministers who still do need to repent!

http://www.setapartbytruth.org/ (Robert Ardis)
The Church of God's Faithful ---My flood miracle occurred as I studied material about the Day of the Lord on the CGF website in 2005. They DID have much truth, but have since rejected provable additional truth.
Therefore they are NO LONGER "set apart by truth" as I believe they may have been at that time.

http://menofsign.org/ (Frank Borg)
Faithful Church of God in Laodicea ---This is the URL link to the church that has recently split away from Robert Ardis. I believe they HAVE continued to prove all things. They also have unique understanding, and a very urgent message.

Their urgent message relates to the immediacy of Luke 17, verses 31, 34 and 35 being fulfilled: Two men are in the same bed; one is received and one is left. Two woman are grinding together; one is received and one is left. Two women are obviously two churches. It seems one church goes to a place of safety and one does not. However regarding the two men in the same bed, a modern way of expressing it might be to say, "two men are both in the same boat", or perhaps, two people are in the same church. One is received and one is not.

Another man --Mike Boone-- also broke away from the Robert Ardis (CGF) group. I've listened to his sermon called "His Great Name". and because this page is about God's government and authority, I want to comment on Mike's sermon here. Mike Boone makes a good case about God's name, the Tetragrammaton -- YHUH or YHWH, being pronounced a certain way. Mike expounds on powerful Scripture which is soon to be fulfilled, such as Malachi 1:11.

"For from the east to the west, My name shall be great among the nations..."

Mike uses many verses as examples to make his point about pronouncing the name correctly, but is he really understanding the main intent of these verses? I believe, in God's mind, what his name represents, is more important than the pronunciation of it, and that is God's primary concern. One verse Mike uses is Zech. 13:9, which is talking about people being refined and calling on God's name. But the question to ask about this verse is, why are they calling on God's name? Is it for needing help in their refining process, or is the emphasis on the pronunciation of God's name? Another verse Mike uses is Acts 9:15 where the Bible tells that Paul was to carry God's name to many people. The question to ask here is, was this commission focused on the pronunciation of the name, or rather, more deeply on explaining who the Messiah really was, in terms of Christ's message, and also the implications of Christ's sacrifice for every person on earth? My understanding of God's name is that the pronunciation is important, however when the Bible talks about God's name, it is mainly referring to the identity, and authority, and power behind that name, and by extension the authority which backs up God's government, and not primarily the pronunciation of God's name.

I've left out MANY sermon links that could be included here. And again, I want to emphasise that these ministers may not be correct in some things (in fact most are not correct regarding all holy day dates, for example)... but I personally find some of the downloads helpful when observing the Sabbath.

 

CHURCH HISTORY

The OTHER letter to Laodicea

HOME